Question
Define absolute poverty. Which income poverty measurement methods do development economists prefer? In which way are income poverty measures different from the UNDP’s
Multidimensional Poverty Index? For what reasons should the measurement of Poverty be an area of concern to developing countries?
Key Learning Outcomes
By the end of this assignment, students should be able to:
- Understand and discuss how income poverty measures are different from the UNDP’s
Multidimensional Poverty Index - Discuss reasons why the measurement of Poverty should be an area of concern to developing countries
- Understand and discuss the income poverty measurement methods preferred by development economists
INTRODUCTION
The comprehension of poverty as a multidimensional challenge has existed for a very long time despite the fact that it has been measured by one dimension only, which is income. The underlying assumption supporting this argument was that the level of income could fairly demonstrate the ability of people to attain some particular thresholds at the minimum within a number of dimensions such as housing, clothing, and nutrition (Alkire and Santos, 2013).
It is not possible to sufficiently measure poverty with income as clearly demonstrated by Amartya Sen’s capability framework. In the recent past, a unified agreement concerning the inadequacy of the income poverty measures has been gaining traction (Sen, 1992).
As stated by Todaro & Smith (2012), this is in part due to the fact that income is not perfectly (i.e. is imperfectly) measured and the benefits obtained from a particular amount of income significantly vary based on the circumstances. In order to incorporate this notion, the United Nations Development Program leveraged its Human Poverty Index (HPI) for the period between 1997 and 2009. The HPI was however substituted for the novel Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) by UNDP in the year 2010 (Todaro & Smith, 2012).
The Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) is a poverty measure that classifies people as poor by using dual cutoffs for levels and numbers of deprivations after which it proceeds to multiply the percentage of individuals living in poverty by the percent of weighted indicators for which poor households are deprived on average (Todaro & Smith, 2012).
The theoretical meaning and measurement of poverty have always garnered a multitude of disparate views which vary from a wide range of ideological and normative points of view and stir up controversies regarding technical challenges involved in poverty measurement (Saunders, 2004).